mustafasrepo commented on code in PR #10651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10651#discussion_r1621856328
##########
datafusion/expr/src/expr_schema.rs:
##########
@@ -158,7 +160,29 @@ impl ExprSchemable for Expr {
.iter()
.map(|e| e.get_type(schema))
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
- fun.return_type(&data_types)
+ match fun {
+ WindowFunctionDefinition::AggregateUDF(udf) => {
+ let new_types =
data_types_with_aggregate_udf(&data_types, udf).map_err(|err| {
+ plan_datafusion_err!(
+ "{} and {}",
+ err,
+ utils::generate_signature_error_msg(
+ fun.name(),
+ fun.signature().clone(),
+ &data_types
+ )
+ )
+ })?;
+ Ok(fun.return_type(&new_types)?)
+ }
+ _ => {
+ let data_types = args
+ .iter()
+ .map(|e| e.get_type(schema))
+ .collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
Review Comment:
Do we need this section?. It seems that `data_types` is already calculated
at the outer scope.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
