andygrove commented on PR #3358: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/3358#issuecomment-3842912320
> This makes sense to me. I think a V2 compatible `native_datafusion`-backed Parquet scan will be pretty straightforward to implement after #3349, so we could close this gap quickly if we needed to. That said, V2 Parquet scans are still opt in so I'd be surprised if too many people noticed the feature gap at the moment. Thanks @mbutrovich. @parthchandra does this make sense? Any objection to moving forward with this change? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
