ozankabak commented on issue #11442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11442#issuecomment-2228268860

   > That said, if the next quarter's focus is on performance, should I 
continue drafting a complete proposal for this change or put it on hold?
   
   I think we should complete the exploratory work. Even if we don't get to 
full-focus on it, this is something we likely want to do at some point 
(gradually or otherwise).
   
   For example, it was through your draft I started to think about what would 
happen to `ScalarValue` in such a design. It is widely used in physical-level 
machinery, so contemplating a change to logical types for that object could be 
problematic. Maybe we should have a logical scalar value and a physical one, 
maybe we will think of something else. But all these thinking was induced by 
your exploratory work, so I think we should complete it. Then we can decide 
what to do with the full findings.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to