kevinjqliu opened a new pull request, #20637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/20637

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   This PR removes the checkout step from the labeler workflow and keeps 
labeling behavior unchanged.
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   The workflow runs on `pull_request_target`, which has elevated repo context. 
`actions/labeler` does not require a local checkout to work with 
`configuration-path`; if the file is not on disk, it fetches it via the GitHub 
API.
   
   Removing checkout reduces attack surface and avoids exposing persisted git 
credentials to subsequent steps.
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   Yes, tested on my forked. 
   
   I force pushed this change to my fork's `main` branch, then open a [test 
PR](https://github.com/kevinjqliu/datafusion/pull/2) against it. The [labeler 
github action ran successfully on my 
fork](https://github.com/kevinjqliu/datafusion/actions/runs/22553132113/job/65326120264)
 and labeled the PR
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to