alamb opened a new issue, #11498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11498
This function seems to have some code repetition with function
[try_process_unnest](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/f204869ff55bb3e39cf23fc0a34ebd5021e6773f/datafusion/sql/src/select.rs#L295).
I wonder if there's a better way to handle this, such as planning unnest
before aggregation, and then reusing the current group-by planning logic. This
seems more intuitive to me. But I'm not sure about it.
_Originally posted by @jonahgao in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11469#discussion_r1678992594_
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
