viirya opened a new pull request, #21565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21565

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   LazyMemoryExec::execute() shares the same generator instance across multiple 
calls via Arc::clone, so a second call to execute(0) continues from where the 
first left off instead of starting from the beginning. This is inconsistent 
with how other ExecutionPlan implementations behave, where each execute() call 
produces an independent stream. This was discovered while writing e2e tests for 
NestedLoopJoinExec memory-limited execution (#21448), where the OOM fallback 
path re-executes the left child plan and got incomplete results. 
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   LazyMemoryExec::execute() was sharing the same generator instance (via 
Arc::clone) across multiple calls, causing streams to share mutable state. This 
meant a second call to execute(0) would continue from where the first call left 
off, instead of starting from the beginning.
   
   Fix by calling reset_state() on the generator to create a fresh instance for 
each execute() call, matching the expected ExecutionPlan semantics that each 
execute() produces an independent stream.
   
   Co-authored-by: Claude Code
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   Unit test
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   No
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to