adriangb commented on PR #22026: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/22026#issuecomment-4389275111
> UX / SQL-layer surface for virtual columns stays deferred to the epic in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/20135 — this follows the same framing alamb blessed for https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/20071 (the input_file_name() UDF) I hate to bring this up but do you think think this approach is compatible with all of the proposed UX versions of this? I don't know that the UDF version is blessed necessarily, I want to make sure we don't back ourselves into a corner. I think the answer is yes but just want to confirm. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
