LiaCastaneda commented on code in PR #22326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/22326#discussion_r3259182940
##########
datafusion/expr/src/type_coercion/functions.rs:
##########
@@ -230,6 +230,64 @@ pub fn value_fields_with_higher_order_udf<L: Clone>(
Ok(current_fields.to_vec())
}
+ HigherOrderTypeSignature::Exact { values, lambdas } => {
Review Comment:
yes it will fail during planning (when the planner calls
`lambda_parameters`), but you are right exact should probably also define the
ordering of the parameters since iirc DF does not enforce any ordering
convention, we actually disussed that on the POC PR
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/18921#discussion_r2985097129
will do it shortly
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
