Dandandan opened a new pull request, #22606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/22606

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   - Does not close an issue.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   `TopK` can currently run after a `ProjectionExec` even when the sort key is 
just a projected input column. If the projection computes values not needed for 
ordering, such as `SELECT 1 ... ORDER BY c LIMIT 10`, those expressions are 
materialized for all input rows instead of only the rows retained by `TopK`.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   - Adds a physical projection pushdown rewrite that moves `TopK` below 
computed projections when all sort keys map through the projection to plain 
input columns.
   - Leaves alias-only projections and computed sort-key projections unchanged 
to avoid broader plan churn or duplicated sort-key computation.
   - Updates ClickBench `EXPLAIN` expectations for affected plans.
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   - `cargo fmt --all`
   - `cargo test -p datafusion-physical-optimizer projection_pushdown -- 
--nocapture`
   - `cargo test --profile=ci --test sqllogictests -- topk.slt`
   - `cargo test --profile=ci --test sqllogictests -- clickbench.slt`
   - `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings`
   - `cargo run --profile release-nonlto -p datafusion-benchmarks --bin dfbench 
-- clickbench -q 34 -i 1 -n 8 --debug`
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   No API changes. Physical plans for some `TopK` queries with computed 
projections can change; query results are unchanged.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to