kumarlokesh opened a new pull request, #22656:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/22656

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #20197.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   `floor(col) = N` is already rewritten via `ScalarUDFImpl::preimage` so that
   predicates push into Parquet row-group statistics. `ceil` and `round` admit
   the same rewrite but have boundary conventions that don't fit the API's
   half-open `[lower, upper)` form: `ceil(x) = N` is `(N-1, N]`, and `round(x) 
= N`
   is sign-dependent under half-away-from-zero. Both can be expressed in
   `[lower, upper)` form by shifting closed boundaries with `f::next_up()`
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   - `CeilFunc::preimage` - Float32/Float64 and all four Decimal variants.
   - `RoundFunc::preimage` - Float32/Float64 (with optional literal `dp`) and 
all
     four Decimal variants for `dp = 0`.
   - Helper functions `ceil_preimage_float` / `ceil_preimage_decimal` in 
`ceil.rs`,
     `round_preimage_float` / `round_preimage_decimal` in `round.rs`.
   - A small `FloatExt` trait in each file bridging `num_traits::Float` to
     `f32::next_up()` / `f64::next_up()`.
   
   No changes to the preimage API, the simplifier, or any optimizer rule.
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   Yes.
   
   - Unit tests cover positive / negative / zero / non-integer / null / 
overflow /
     non-finite cases for both float and decimal variants.
   - SLT tests (`ceil_preimage.slt`, `round_preimage.slt`) cover data 
correctness
     and `EXPLAIN` output for all six comparison operators plus
     `IS (NOT) DISTINCT FROM` and `IN`/`NOT IN`.
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   No public API change. The optimization is transparent and predicate semantics
   are preserved exactly.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to