tschwarzinger opened a new issue, #23179: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/23179
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Currently, as far as I am concerned, there are no benchmarks that focus on the planning of custom query plans. This issue tracks adding such a benchmark. ### Describe the solution you'd like I think we should have an `extension_planner` (or similar) file with the following things: - An `ExtensionPlanner` that implements a custom version of some built-in operator (e.g., a special node for doing a common projection in a system) - A benchmark that plans the custom logical plan - A benchmark that achieves the same goal using a built-in operator - Quite likely more (e.g., planning of extension types etc.) This should allow us to compare the overhead of planning an extension logical plan versus built-in logical plans. Ideally, we should try to get this down to "zero", such that custom plans do not suffer from any drawbacks. ### Describe alternatives you've considered - Let downstream projects find the performance regressions ;) ### Additional context This issue was raised in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/23157 I am quite busy till end of July, but I'll try to add such a benchmark afterwards if no one beats me to it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
