Phoenix500526 opened a new pull request, #23185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/23185

   
   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #23010 
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   `try_pushdown_through_join` (`datafusion/physical-plan/src/projection.rs`)
   decided whether each projected join-output column belonged to the left or 
right
   child by comparing its output index against the left child's field count
   (`join_table_borders`) — i.e. it assumed the join output is a plain
   `left ++ right` concatenation.
   
   That assumption does not hold for all join types. A `LeftMark` / `RightMark`
   join appends a synthetic `mark` boolean column that has `JoinSide::None` and
   originates from neither child, so reasoning from output position can route 
the
   `mark` column to the wrong child. This is the panic that #22902 worked 
around by
   **disabling** projection pushdown for `LeftMark` / `RightMark` in 
`HashJoinExec`
   and `NestedLoopJoinExec` — correct, but it left the helper reasoning from 
output
   position rather than from the join's actual output-origin contract.
   
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   - Thread the join's output-origin metadata (`&[ColumnIndex]`, already 
computed by
     `build_join_schema`) into `try_pushdown_through_join`.
   - Replace the output-position split (`join_table_borders` +
     `index < left_field_count`) with grouping by `ColumnIndex.side`:
     - `Left` / `Right` columns are collected per child using the child-relative
       `ColumnIndex.index`;
     - a `JoinSide::None` (synthetic, e.g. `mark`) column makes the pushdown 
decline
       (`Ok(None)`), so the projection is embedded into the join instead — no 
panic,
       no mis-routing.
   - Remove the `LeftMark | RightMark` bypass from
     `HashJoinExec::try_swapping_with_projection` and
     `NestedLoopJoinExec::try_swapping_with_projection`; they now call
     `try_pushdown_through_join` uniformly.
   - The shared helpers used by cross / symmetric-hash / sort-merge join 
pushdown
     (`new_join_children`, `join_table_borders`, `join_allows_pushdown`,
     `update_join_on`, `update_join_filter`) keep their signatures. The 
side-grouped
     path uses a new private `new_join_children_from_groups` and reuses
     `update_join_on` / `update_join_filter` with a zero column-index offset 
(the
     groups already carry child-relative indices).
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   Yes.
   
   - New `subquery.slt` cases place a subset/reordering projection over a mark 
join
     — hash `LeftMark` (`IN` under `OR`), negated mark (`NOT EXISTS` under 
`OR`),
     and nested-loop mark (non-equi correlated) — asserting both the query 
result
     and the `EXPLAIN` plan shape.
   - Existing coverage is preserved: `cargo test -p datafusion-physical-plan
     projection` (incl. the filter-pushdown and `join_table_borders` unit 
tests),
     the join `*.slt` suite, and `subquery.slt` all pass.
   - `cargo clippy -p datafusion-physical-plan -- -D warnings` and `cargo fmt 
--all`
     are clean.
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   
   No behavior change: the produced physical plans are unchanged for the 
supported
   cases (mark joins keep falling back to the same embedded-projection plan as
   before, regular joins push down as before).
   
   One signature change to a `pub` helper: `try_pushdown_through_join` gains a
   `column_indices: &[ColumnIndex]` parameter (all in-tree callers are 
updated). If
   the project treats this helper as part of the public API surface, please add 
the
   `api change` label.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to