alamb commented on issue #23236: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/23236#issuecomment-4833624296
> keep HashPartitioned but document it as historical naming for key partitioning (I am not a fan of this one) I vote we start with this one, as it is clearly better than the status quo and has no downstream API implications > migrate to a KeyPartitioned name and have both Partitioning::Hash and compatible Partitioning::Range satisfy this This seems like a good idea on the surface, but I think we would have to evaluate how disruptive it could be on on other DataFusion users -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
