alamb opened a new pull request, #23308: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/23308
## Which issue does this PR close? - Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/19241 - part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/23307 - Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/23305 ## Rationale for this change We are adding SQL-level coverage for the integer IN list specialization paths. https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/23305 adds the initial integer `IN` coverage. This PR adds paired `NOT IN` coverage so the SLT file also exercises the negated IN list implementation paths while keeping the expected results easy to audit. ## What changes are included in this PR? 1. Add paired `NOT IN` checks for the existing integer IN list queries 2. Compare `IN` and `NOT IN` with `<>` so non-null inverse results are expected to be `true` 3. Cover the existing min, max, no-match, nullable-input, and null-in-list integer cases ## Are these changes tested? Only tests ## Are there any user-facing changes? No -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
