2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #24422:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/24422

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #24421 
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   
   Please explain the problem you are trying to solve in terms of the 
user-visible
   behavior, rather than the implementation.
   
   For example, "The code in `foo.rs` doesn't handle nulls" is a symptom of the
   implementation. "COUNT(DISTINCT) returns wrong results when the column 
contains
   nulls" is the user-visible problem.
   -->
   The aggregation planning will enable ordering optimization when the grouping 
sets is available, however they're not compatible now.
   
   I'm also not sure if we want to enable ordering optimization for grouping 
sets, since this seems requires extra implementation complexity.
   
   This PR disables ordering/streaming aggregation optimization when grouping 
set is present.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here, but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   - 80cb8eee1375097262a2c8e0c6b92109563128fe: reproducer that fails without 
the fix
   - 4ddfc45712616af660dddd73dc0d346747a5703b: fix. It disables ordering 
optimization when grouping set is present
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   slt
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   no


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to