sunchao commented on code in PR #5852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/5852#discussion_r3985810040


##########
.github/workflows/pr_build_linux.yml:
##########
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ jobs:
           restore-keys: |
             ${{ runner.os }}-java-maven-
 
+      - name: Bootstrap Maven
+        uses: ./.github/actions/maven-bootstrap

Review Comment:
   ### Correctness
   
   [P2] Route changes to the new bootstrap action into Linux CI
   
   Could you add `.github/actions/maven-bootstrap/**` to 
`FILTERS['build_linux']` in `dev/ci/compute-changes.py` and add a routing case 
in `dev/ci/check-ci-config.py`? With only 
`.github/actions/maven-bootstrap/action.yaml` as input, the current filter 
returns `build_linux=false`. The `ci.yml` gate then skips the entire Linux 
workflow, including all five consumers of this new action, so an action-only 
change can pass preflight without exercising the bootstrap. This PR's CI run 
does not expose the gap because the accompanying edit to `pr_build_linux.yml` 
makes the filter true. [Filter at the reviewed 
head](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/blob/ef823b74d6159fba8f92bb7ea71958dea54e66df/dev/ci/compute-changes.py#L29-L52).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to