2010YOUY01 commented on issue #25563: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25563#issuecomment-5787169493
> > Unsafe public APIs: mutating one field may silently violate invariants involving other fields. > > This is different than `unsafe` in the rust memory safety sense, right? As long as we aren't planning to add `unsafe` keywords to functions this makes sense to me Yes, it’s a more general idea, like “error-prone public APIs.” I’ll try to avoid using “unsafe” in a Rust context to prevent term collisions. 😄 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
