Rich-T-kid commented on issue #7001: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7001#issuecomment-5801686909
this idea is somewhat similar to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15382 but we arent skipping `take()` + `batchCoalecer` as the issue proposes. we would keep the same indices `take()` would accept but instead pass it along to batchCoalecer. we don't need to change anything else about how the plan executes, the changes would be purely scooped to the repartition operator -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
