dwsmith1983 commented on issue #6575:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/6575#issuecomment-5975831644

   Proposal once #5872 lands: route the two SDK names through 
`HadoopS3ACredentialProviderAdapter` the same way #5872 routes Hadoop's 
`ProfileAWSCredentialsProvider`. Hadoop maps both names to the Java SDK's 
`ProfileCredentialsProvider`, so they would resolve exactly as in Spark, 
including the cases above, and on Spark 3.x through the adapter's SDK v1 build. 
The change itself is small: the provider class lookup, its table test, and the 
docs.
   
   The trade-off is that these names work today, unlike the profile provider 
#5872 handles, so routing them adds the adapter's requirements to 
configurations that run now:
   
   - hadoop-aws and the AWS SDK must be visible to Comet's class loader; with 
Comet on `extraClassPath` and hadoop-aws only through `--packages`, the scan 
would fail with `NoClassDefFoundError` where it works today;
   - a profile with static keys asks the provider through JNI on each request.
   
   The cases that differ are uncommon profile shapes (keys plus 
`credential_process` in one source profile, multi-role chains with different 
regions, a role naming itself as `source_profile`, SSO keys with `role_arn`); a 
plain profile or a single role mostly works today. I would not fall back to the 
native path when the adapter cannot load, since the signing identity would then 
depend on the classpath.
   
   @sunchao @andygrove does the classpath requirement for existing 
configurations look acceptable? If so I'll open the PR after #5872 merges.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to