2010YOUY01 commented on PR #26227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/26227#issuecomment-6394732608

   @jayzhan211 Thank you for the review
   
   > @2010YOUY01 On the coverage question: the feature-freeze plan sounds good 
to me, but once this merges nothing runs with `enable_migration_hash_join = 
false` for inner/left/right/full joins, and that's the setting users would fall 
back to if the new path has a bug. #22729 handled the same problem by 
randomizing `enable_migration_aggregate` in the aggregation fuzzer. Doing the 
same in `run_test` in `join_fuzz.rs` is only a few lines, and it's fine as a 
follow-up:
   > 
   > ```rust
   > for (i, batch_size) in self.batch_sizes.iter().enumerate() {
   >     let mut session_config = 
SessionConfig::new().with_batch_size(*batch_size);
   >     // Keep the legacy path covered until it is removed (#26361)
   >     session_config
   >         .options_mut()
   >         .execution
   >         .enable_migration_hash_join = i % 2 == 0;
   > ```
   
   Addressed in 
[4b20989](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/26227/commits/4b20989d13ef494a573a16efe4751472327853c4),
 and also added several `enable_migration_hash_join = false/true` config matrix 
in major slts.
   
   I agree we can keep them. It's only 20 LoC in total, and easy to add/revert.
   
   As explained above in the 'feature-freeze' approach, leaving the old impl 
untested is probably okay, since it should remain stable if we don't change it. 
However, I think changes in other components might propagate to the old HJ impl 
and cause some bugs to surface.
   
   I think this approach cheaply preserves most of the test coverage for extra 
assurance. Some UTs won't run on the old impl, but that should be acceptable 
given the 'feature-freeze' assumption.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to