alamb commented on issue #7845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7845#issuecomment-2380722664

   > When the row filtering was initially implemented we discussed keeping the 
decoded data cached but ended up deciding against it because it can potentially 
consume a lot of memory
   
   Yes I would like to revisit this assumption eventually but I need to study 
the code more to convince myself it is possible


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to