blaginin commented on code in PR #13452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13452#discussion_r1845634892
##########
datafusion/expr-common/src/type_coercion/binary.rs:
##########
@@ -1138,27 +1138,44 @@ fn numeric_string_coercion(lhs_type: &DataType,
rhs_type: &DataType) -> Option<D
}
}
+fn coerce_list_children(lhs_field: &FieldRef, rhs_field: &FieldRef) ->
Option<FieldRef> {
+ Some(Arc::new(
+
Arc::unwrap_or_clone(Arc::clone(lhs_field)).with_data_type(comparison_coercion(
Review Comment:
So both will work, but IMO the current version is a bit better as it makes
code aligned with the dictionally behaviour (`dictionary_comparison_coercion`
uses `comparison_coercion`)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
