phillipleblanc commented on issue #13822: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13822#issuecomment-2550961042
> I understand all you want is for SQL parser/analyzer to desugar one.two.three.four.five into one."two.three.four".five` so that query author doesn't need to do anything. Yes, that is my main goal. Basically sugar around what we can already do today with `one."two.three.four".five`. > Would every catalog be responsible for identifier re-parsing (a task solved by SQL parser today)? I don't think the catalog would need to do anything special, as long as it follows the same rule for registering the schemas available. But its possible I'm missing something. > the dotted syntax is not only for resolving table names, it's also used for column resolution I see, that would make parsing that more complicated. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
