mbrobbel opened a new pull request, #14480:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14480

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   None.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   With the MSRV > 1.80 we can use `std::sync::LazyLock` instead of 
`once_cell::Lazy`.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   Remove `once_cell` dependency from `datafusion-physical-plan` and replace 
use of `once_cell::Lazy` with `std::sync::LazyLock`.
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   CI.
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   Datafusion crates no longer depend directly on `once_cell`.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to