rkrishn7 commented on code in PR #14472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14472#discussion_r1943660946


##########
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs:
##########
@@ -296,12 +298,14 @@ impl LogicalPlanBuilder {
             field_types.push(common_type.unwrap_or(DataType::Null));
         }
 
-        Self::infer_inner(values, &field_types, &schema)
+        let field_nullabilities = (0..n_cols).map(|_| 
true).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+        Self::infer_inner(values, &field_types, &field_nullabilities, &schema)
     }
 
     fn infer_inner(
         mut values: Vec<Vec<Expr>>,
         field_types: &[DataType],
+        field_nullabilities: &[bool],

Review Comment:
   Yes, good call out!
   
   We end up cloning the data type to construct the field, so I just created a 
small container which encapsulates the naming logic as well. Think it cleans 
things up a bit!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to