Weijun-H commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2658410453

   > > > > I wonder why tpch_mem_sf10 is slower for some queries? Might it be 
possible the created memtable is not created evenly because of the new round 
robin (that might be fixable e.g. by introducing another repartition after 
memoryexec).
   > > > 
   > > > 
   > > > Thank you for the advice @Dandandan. We will certainly check that 
after completing on-demand optimizations.
   > > 
   > > 
   > > I agree with @berkaysynnada because `OnDemandRepartition` is not set by 
default; it should be enabled when necessary. However, it is a good point for 
the following optimization, @Dandandan 👍.
   > 
   > I wonder if we can set it to default once we know it generally leads to 
faster execution?
   
   Yes, I believe it would be better to set `OnDemandRepartition` by default 
later, as it generally results in faster execution. For now, it is acceptable 
to disable it and wait for further optimization in iterations.
   
   > Specifically, I think we can try [this 
approach](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13707) together with 
on-demand repartition 🤔
   
   It could be an optimization, I will try to rebase it later
   
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to