2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #15302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15302

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   This is a refactor towards https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14748 
and https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7053
   
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   Arrow Row format speeds up comparison between multiple ORDER BY keys, and 
now it's only used in one special case that column-by-column comparison is not 
working, and a new converter will be constructed for each incoming 
`RecordBatch`.
   This PR: A more efficient way is to construct a `RowConverter` when 
initializing the sort operator, and reuse the same converter during execution.
   Note:
   - The old logic is kept: only using row format for one special case, 
enabling it by default requires more benchmarking and thus should be done as a 
follow-up.
   - Since we hope to use row format by default, for simplicity, this PR always 
constructs a converter when initializing `ExternalSorter`, instead of only do 
so for the special case.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   - Construct a converter when initializing `ExternalSorter`
   - Reuse the row converter during execution
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   Existing tests.
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to