wiedld commented on code in PR #15409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15409#discussion_r2011688314
##########
datafusion/core/tests/fuzz_cases/aggregate_fuzz.rs:
##########
@@ -520,7 +520,9 @@ async fn group_by_string_test(
let expected = compute_counts(&input, column_name);
let schema = input[0].schema();
- let session_config = SessionConfig::new().with_batch_size(50);
+ let session_config = SessionConfig::new()
+ .with_batch_size(50)
+ .with_repartition_file_scans(false);
Review Comment:
Also note the existing configuration `repartition_file_scans` that is [used
here](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/908ca0e684f3184075ef799128ee3f58f1e9db86/datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/enforce_distribution.rs#L1171)
to determine repartitioning.
It's naming doesn't quite match a mem table (because not a file)? Should I
be updating the naming (and the config docs as well) in a follow up PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
