etseidl commented on issue #15742: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15742#issuecomment-2814062585
After a bit of spelunking through the plan generation code, I figured out why my second suggestion doesn't make sense. Deep down the types will be coerced to a common type for comparison, with the lower precision being coerced to the higher, so that part is all as designed. I'll start on adding more data types to `verify_support_type_for_prune`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
