andygrove opened a new issue, #1681:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1681

   ### Describe the bug
   
   The following test currently fails:
   
   ```scala
     test("nested data - array of struct") {
       val data = (1 to 10).map(i => Tuple1(Seq(i -> s"val_$i")))
       withParquetTable(data, "t") {
         withSQLConf(CometConf.COMET_NATIVE_SCAN_IMPL.key -> 
CometConf.SCAN_NATIVE_ICEBERG_COMPAT) {
           checkSparkAnswerAndOperator(sql("SELECT _1[0]._2 FROM t"))
         }
       }
     }
   
   ```
   
   The parquet file contains an array of struct, where the struct has fields 
`_1` and `_2`.
   
   The required schema in the scan filters out the `_1` from the struct:
   
   ```
   required_schema = Field { name: "_1", data_type: List(Field { name: "item", 
data_type: Struct([Field { name: "_2", data_type: Utf8, nullable: true, 
dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }]), nullable: true, dict_id: 
0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }), nullable: true, dict_id: 0, 
dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }
   ```
   
   The projection contains `GetStructField` with ordinal `0` to represent field 
`_2` in the struct.
   
   Comet does not apply the required schema and therefore selects both `_1` and 
`_2` from the struct, and the `GetStructField` with `ordinal=0` returns `_1` 
instead of `_2`.
   
   
   ### Steps to reproduce
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Expected behavior
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to