Dandandan commented on PR #15768: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15768#issuecomment-2836308324
Hmmm... I think the speedup actually doesn't come from using `interleave` but from yielding less often (once per partition_num * partition_num batches, rather than once per partition_num). Changing this in the original also makes this faster (thus `interleave` is actually still slower than `take` + `concat` ATM. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
