alamb commented on PR #17008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17008#issuecomment-3148334946

   > > Another potential idea is to simply switch to using the coalesce kernel 
directly (so we don't have to maintain a separate copy)
   > > 
   > > * [Draft: Use upstream arrow `coalesce` kernel in DataFusion 
#16249](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16249)
   > 
   > Thank you @alamb for the review! I agree that switching to the upstream 
coalesce kernel would be the ideal follow-up solution. Is there anything I can 
do to help push this forward? I'd be happy to contribute.
   
   Thanks @zhuqi-lucas -- as always super appreciated
   
   Maybe once we upgrade to DataFusion 56 you can revive 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16249 ? I think it is basically ok, 
but would benefit from having someone else go through the code and double 
check. The existing failures I think were due to other changes made at the 
time, and I suspect (hope) it will "just work"


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to