alamb commented on issue #12644: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12644#issuecomment-3165632416
> Is this the end state we want to achieve? In my mind it is better than what is currently possible. I agree we can come up with other better designs too > I agree that DataFusion would benefit from embracing its own definition of a (dynamic, session-registered) data type that allows a type author to specify behaviour in such a way that DataFusion internals (e.g., optimizer rules, casting) can benefit things that are not just built-in arrow types I mean I agree with this too -- in my mind the question is how actually to achieve this goal -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
