alamb commented on issue #17207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17207#issuecomment-3192293792

   > As I was reading through this I was feeling somewhat concerned about how 
easy it might be to accidentally miss calls that should be instrumented, 
however, I think the implementation suggestion completely solves any of those 
concerns.
   
   Indeed -- since all IO is routed through the ObjectStore trait I think we 
can be pretty sure about not missing any of them
   
   > I do have one small concern here, which is the output may end up being 
very verbose, potentially to the point of being useless for human consumption 
in certain situations. An example situation might be something like a highly 
selective filter operating on string (binary) data for a large parquet dataset. 
Just the quantity of GET requests to fetch parquet pages could end up being 
overwhelming. I don't want to let "perfect" be the enemy of "good," so perhaps 
this is better suited to a follow-on PR, but I'm wondering if summary 
statistics might end up being generally more useful than individual request 
data.
   
   I agree that would be good
   
   Maybe we could have different formats for outputting the display
   * `text` - full details human readable
   * `summary` -- the summary format you propos
   * `json` -- machine readable output 🤔 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to