Hi, In light of this thread:
<http://groups.google.com/group/github/browse_thread/thread/ a434ef8706d98c03/60f18755c64aae3c?hl=en> (which I can't bump because Google has closed it), and this Twitter from PJ: <http://twitter.com/pjhyett/status/2011882344>: > To be clear, GitHub:FI is meant for larger teams and priced as such. > If you have a three-person shop, you should be using http://github.com I'm curious what small teams (like my company, which is a start up of exactly 3 people, much like GitHub) are supposed to do when they have legal or security reasons for not wanting to use a public repository? We have both licensing and security requirements as to why we can't use GitHub. The security reasons aren't "my boss won't let me use GitHub" reasons, but real reasons of intellectual property and wanting to have vetted employees who can see the code (given our business model relies on control of our source code, much like GitHub's, in fact). That said, the quote above, and lack of response from GitHub to our inquiry about pricing lead me to suspect this might not be suitable for our needs: but really we'd like to make up our own mind as a business about whether the price is prohibitive or not. I've been giving GitHub money via my personal account for almost a year now, and am happy to continue doing so. I'd really like to use it for work, too. But the prevailing attitude seems to be that it's unsuitable for our needs. So if it's not small teams, what kind of teams is this product aimed at? Brad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GitHub" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/github?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
