ywkaras commented on pull request #8663: URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/8663#issuecomment-1035523608
In failed regression tests in #8662 like https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github_Builds/job/centos/508/console we see: ``` REGRESSION TEST SDK_API_TSHttpConnectServerIntercept started [Feb 10 15:53:20.173] [ET_NET 0] WARNING: connection to DNS server 10.255.250.30 lost, marking as down [Feb 10 15:53:20.173] [ET_NET 0] WARNING: connection to DNS server 10.255.251.30 lost, marking as down [Feb 10 15:53:20.173] [ET_NET 0] WARNING: connection to all DNS servers lost, retrying TEST 158 *** STARTING *** *** TEST 158 *** PASSED *** ... Regression test(SDK_API_TSHttpConnectServerIntercept) still in progress Regression test(SDK_API_TSHttpConnectServerIntercept) still in progress [Feb 10 15:53:50.174] [ET_NET 2] WARNING: Synserver failed to bind to port 65535. Fatal: traffic_server/InkAPITest.cc:910: failed assertion `!"Synserver must be able to bind to a port, check system netstat"` ``` In successful tests, we'll eventually see: ``` [Feb 10 15:52:11.589] [ET_NET 0] WARNING: connection to DNS server 10.255.250.30 restored ``` What's weird is that I don't think the ConnectServerIntercept test should really need any DNS lookup, it's testing the APIs for intercept plugins. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
