Hi Diego, On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Diego Algorta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least... if it's not really possible to do the perms check on a per > user basis... maybe there's some way to at least limit the git-daemon > to only deliver clones to gitorious registered users?
Another approach, which would require a bit of code, is to be able to set read/write permissions on a per user basis, and then only having people clone via ssh. That way the ./script/gitorious command (which does the auth for writing) could be written that it'll check both the incoming git command and whether that user has access or not. But, there's little support out of the box for it. But, considering the amount of people using gitorious for private install (according to the git-survery results at least) maybe it's time to support such scenarios proper? > Thank you! Cheers, JS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gitorious" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gitorious?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
