Hey, like the new gitorious.org. I like the project-centric approach to repositories. My Github account was getting cluttered with a bunch of functionally-related repositories, and it's nice to group them, and to have the option of sharing control if they ever take off. I'll be migrating my projects shortly. I did have some questions and suggestions first, though.
First, licensing. Can we have the ability to set a license per repository as well as per project? Maybe each repository gets its own license inherited from the default set by the project? It seems a bit artificial to me to decide that all project code is under a uniform license. What about projects under software licenses, with a versioned website or dataset under some version of the CC license? What I've done for one of my projects is to set its license to "other," then require that the user check the repository content itself for the license, but while that works, without repository-specific licensing you've either got a situation where the field is useless at best or inaccurate at worst (in more complex cases, anyway.) Also, is it possible to rename a repository after creation? Seems like it should be, but I can't find how. Is this a remnant of the one repo per project model wherein renaming the repository wouldn't make sense? Thinking it might be, as there are still spots where "project" seems to take the place of "repository," but not entirely sure. Finally, is it possible to associate an OpenID with an existing account? I poked around a bit on the user profile page but nothing jumped out at me. Thanks again for a cool service. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gitorious" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gitorious?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
