The fork still exists as a merge request [1].

We have gitorious running on our private server using a sub base uri
(e.g. http://someserver.com/gitorious/), but we hardcoded almost every
existance of '/' to '/gitorious/'. I have a clone of the new
gitorious, which runs with these modifications. See [2] for more the
changes made to mainline.

Greets, Thomas

[1]: 
http://gitorious.org/~dcrec1/gitorious/dcrec1s-clone/commit/c37d420f8ccb13933093dcc00af2ce2a4555fc35
[2]: http://gitorious.org/~tschamm/gitorious/tschamms-clone

On Jun 3, 7:14 pm, "Per Christian B. Viken" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:06 PM, Steve Hajducko wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > We installed gitorious on a system where we have several other rails
> > apps running and I've got it running in a mongrel+apache setup with
> > mod_proxy.
>
> > The problem we're running into is that we run the app 
> > ashttp://host.example.com/git/
> > - We've found is that there are certain times when gitorious redirects
> > the user back to /, which ends up being some other site rather than
> > the app.
>
> > I've gone through the code and found a few instances where this
> > happens - mostly in session_controller, users_controller and
> > merge_requests_controller.  Would it be possible to change this to be
> > a configurable value via gitorious.yml?  I didn't want to post a patch
> > because I'm not sure if there are other instances yet where gitorious
> > assumes that it's running out of '/' on the site - I only really did
> > this to the obvious instances and then added a 'gitorious_url' to the
> > gitorious.yml file.
>
> > If those really are the *only* places, I can submit the patches up -
> > wasn't sure on the name of the config variable either but I couldn't
> > think of anything better to call it. :)  Maybe gitorious_urlroot
>
> One problem is that the CSS-files contains tons of references to  
> images found in "/images". Not sure what the best way to deal with  
> those are, but I'm sure it could be done.
>
> There was a fork of Gitorious that did something similar, I can't  
> remember the exact name right now. That was for the old version of  
> Gitorious however, and might not work very well anymore. But maybe you  
> could get some ideas.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Gitorious" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gitorious?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to