2011/7/4 Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]>: > Em 04-07-2011 09:43, Guilhem Bonnefille escreveu: >> >> 2011/7/3 Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<[email protected]>: >>> >>> Then, I would like to start a discussion of a feature I always missed in >>> Gitorious. That discussion is also in alignment with the recent concerns >>> about Gitorious versioning. >>> >>> Mailing list are ineffective as an issue tracking system and Gitorious >>> definitely needs an issue tracking system. >>> >>> Writing a good tracking system from scratch and integrating it to >>> Gitorious >>> is too much work. That means it won't happen any time soon. It also means >>> more code to maintain. >>> >>> Using an external issue-tracking system integrated to Gitorious, as the >>> Ruby >>> language does with Redmine, seems to be the way to go for now. >> >> Of course, external issue-tracking is probably the most simple >> solution. But why not promoting more and more distributed model? I >> know that many distributed issue tracking tools exist. Why not >> selecting and integrating one with gitorious? This would give >> gitorious many advantages over other solution. > > Could you be more specific? Is there any specific tool you're talking about. > The ones I've seen cannot be compared to Redmine or Chiliproject > powerness... > > What kind of benefits do you see in those distributed issue tracking > alternatives?
The simple answer: the same benefits as distributed version control. The longer: - synced with source code - stored in the history (backup, local/forked bugs...) - simply editable (vi/emacs is enough) The matter is the lack of high level GUI. And, IMHO, a tool like gitorious can do this. -- Guilhem BONNEFILLE -=- JID: [email protected] MSN: [email protected] -=- mailto:[email protected] -=- http://nathguil.free.fr/ -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
