Hey guys,

I have now released Gitorious 2.0.0, a versioning "manifesto", an upgrade
guide and an issue tracker :) Will make a separate post to announce these
things.

Christian

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 13:37, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]>wrote:

> I would love to help on this, but currently I'm too busy changing my job
> and I still want to help Gitorious to upgrade Rails, so I'll post-pone my
> help.
>
> But, if you need some assistance or want to discuss some approaches, feel
> free to talk with me.
>
> Best regards, Rodrigo.
>
> Em 06-07-2011 00:45, Nagaraj escreveu:
>
>  We just started.
>> we are still going through the applications, db tables...
>> if somebody is doing please guide us.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 9:18 pm, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> Em 05-07-2011 11:52, Nagaraj escreveu:
>>>
>>>  Hi all,
>>>> I am trying to integrate gitorious and chiliproject!
>>>>
>>> Great news! I was willing to do that after Gitorious has upgraded Rails
>>> from 2 to 3.
>>>
>>> Is the source-code somewhere?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Rodrigo.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Using an external issue-tracking system integrated to Gitorious, as the
>>>>> Ruby language does with Redmine, seems to be the way to go for now.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes I agree.
>>>> We are integrating chiliproject with gitorious, our aim is when a
>>>> project is created in gitorious corresponding issue tracking must be
>>>> created in chiliproject. We would like to have links(gantt/calendar,
>>>> issues, forums,etc...) from gitorious to chiliproject and vice versa.
>>>> We are eagerly looking for community support.
>>>> Thanks&    Regards
>>>> Nagaraj P G
>>>> On Jul 5, 6:38 pm, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Em 05-07-2011 09:55, Pedro Kiefer escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see any advantage in having a distributed issue tracker, maybe
>>>>>> there are some, but I think issue tracking is a central and unique
>>>>>> service. You don't want (at least I don't see a reason for) Q&A,
>>>>>> testing and management to have a clone of your repositories for adding
>>>>>> bug reports. And you definitely don't want to have some issues added
>>>>>> to a fork and not the main repository.
>>>>>> Having a pluggable system, for supporting chiliproject, redmine, jira,
>>>>>> bugzilla, or some other issue tracker is probably the best solution on
>>>>>> the long run.
>>>>>>
>>>>> That's exactly what I think too.
>>>>>
>>>>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> gitorious+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<gitorious%[email protected]>
>



-- 
MVH
Christian

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to