Thank you Benjamin. This is correct: we will continue to actively develop Gitorious on master, and we will try to keep it stable as before. However, the tags will receive more testing, and in general should be more reliable as a mechanism to upgrade local installs. So, master should be considered "Gitorious beta" (generally stable, may have occasional issues, incomplete features a.s.o), while tags provide stable releases.
Christian On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 20:35, Benjamin Podszun <[email protected]>wrote: > I fail to understand your point. > The team decided to use master as development branch. If you want stable > versions, stick with tags. In other words: Development moved on, but nothing > was tagged as new version (be it a minor step forward or a major) yet. > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Drew <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That makes sense now. But you guys have been pushing code to mainline >> and not updating the tags. That's not good. >> >> >> On Aug 1, 11:50 pm, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Drew <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > When I run git tag, I get: >> > > 20110110-1 >> > > loba-loba >> > > v2.0.0 >> > >> > > Seems like the only version tag you guys have is v2.0.0 on >> > > git://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline.git >> > > So you guys are not following the versioning scheme yet? How can there >> > > not be other versions but code changes? >> > >> > We haven't deployed any changes since 2.0.0, too busy enjoying summer >> :-) >> > >> > - Marius >> >> -- >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> > > -- > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > -- MVH Christian -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
