On 10/09/09 15:59, Pieter de Bie wrote: > That sounds reasonable, though I'm not sure how interesting people > will find this.
The people that took the time filling out the survey _and_ writing a free text surely will find it satisfying to see their questions answered (or their complaints noted). There is not that much user-developer communication going on (this isn't criticism, just an observation), and we can reach most of the GitX-users only through the release-notes which are displayed by the auto-update feature. To be quite frank, for most other Mac-OS open source software (like MacVim for example) I'm too lazy to check out their website/ML/bugtracker as well only because some software I use now and then has a few minor problems ;) It also bugs me to be compared to something like Versions.app (I've heard that a few times now), a product sold for $40 a pop and developed by a whole team of full-time programmers. I want to start a "if it's broken, try to fix it yourself before twittering about it" culture, to help further the development-process. Greetings, Jojo (PR-Manager :P) -- Johannes Gilger <[email protected]> http://heipei.net GPG-Key: 0x42F6DE81 GPG-Fingerprint: BB49 F967 775E BB52 3A81 882C 58EE B178 42F6 DE81
