Sounds good to me, I have been woring on a couple of new views for GitX.

On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:25 , Michael Dippery wrote:

>> Thanks for the hint. However, this patch shows why we should integrate
>> and release something soon (or else every new patch stands the chance of
>> being pointless because already included): While this might be true for
>> stable and for Andre Berg's branches, this is fixed in Nathan's
>> experimental branch.
> 
> Yeah, it's fixed in my fork as well [1].
> 
> I think this brings up a question I've had: What exactly is the status of 
> this project? I appreciate all the work pieter did on GitX, but it seems like 
> he's not terribly active on the project anymore? Is it time to re-organize 
> the project under new development leadership, set up a new "canonical" repo, 
> and get working on this?
> 
> GPGMail development was similarly stagnant as a couple months ago, but a few 
> developers stepped up and refocused the project. They set up a main repo on 
> GitHub, granted a few devs write access, relaunched the webpage, and have 
> been moving the project along pretty well. Should we do something similar? 
> Set up a "gitx" organization on GitHub, push in the "latest" common repo, 
> give some devs write access and let them push their experimental changes and 
> whatnot into the repo? That way, we'd have a set of core developers and a 
> repo from which other collaborators could easily get changes.
> 
> 
> ----
> Michael Dippery
> [email protected] | www.monkey-robot.com
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://github.com/mdippery/gitx/commit/c1d89d6858290f630eab745faaa2c03d2ad6d6a8

Reply via email to