On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:18 AM, jdpglobal wrote: > I think it would be a smart move to have a team of core - contributors > working on a single fork. > The team would set some targets to shoot for / goals and this would > help reduce duplicate efforts. Don't like the goals or targets? Then > fork it. This would force daily pulls / pushes to reduce merge > conflicts but could accelerate 'concentrated' efforts. I'm not talking > about everyone going and doing what ever they like, there would be > some direction. One fork to rule them all.
I brought up this idea a while back [1], but there wasn't much discussion on the issue. I think brotherbard's GitHub fork is, for now, considered to be the repo where most development takes place, but I agree that it'd be nice to have a more centralized core of developments, and a "canonical" repo for development. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/gitx/msg/3af6512b5a99a622 ---- Michael Dippery [email protected] | www.monkey-robot.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
