Dear GKD Members, I guess like everyone else, I've been watching the tragic events unfold on television with a sense of sadness and powerlessness. Not much that one can do from so far away except at this point to make a donation and to make the kinds of noises that get governments to move away from inactivity.
Fortunately my family and I weren't personally impacted so far as we know, but the events took on a very direct force when we saw what seemed to be video from a resort in Thailand where we had stayed 3 years ago and which indicated that the bungalow where we were staying would have been completely inundated by the wave. And thinking of it and scanning the Net for information and for stories I'm struck by a couple of things concerning the role (and lack of role) of the Net in these events. The Net appears to be playing a very significant part in responding to the needs of those at a distance--the on-lookers for information, stories, ways of contributing and so on; families and friends of those possibly impacted with attempts at creating listings of the found and the lost and for those on the ground to manage the concerns and queries of those farther away; and one expects that behind the scenes much of the co-ordination and planning that is being done by aid organizations is being done in ways that are pushing the boundaries of Computer Mediated Communication and managing at a distance. But I guess I'm a bit surprised that the Net wasn't able (yet?) to bridge the information divides between those who had some idea about what might be coming (the scientists and those immediately impacted) and those who might have been able to make some use of that information in the places where the impact took appreciable time to be realized. The problem here was not, I think, a "Digital Divide", rather than perhaps it is another example of what I've referred to elsewhere as the gap between "access" and "effective use" <http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue8_12/gurstein/index.html>. From what I can gather most if not all of the communities impacted had Internet "access" in one form or another. What they (and here I would include those with the knowledge who couldn't use it as well as those without knowledge) lacked, rather, was the social, organizational, informational, and applications infrastructure which could have turned Internet access into an "effectively usable" early warning system. Those who had the information couldn't use it, and those who needed the information couldn't/didn't "get it". The "degrees of separation" imposed by nationality, language and perhaps most important, domains of knowledge and profession (and the related social linkages, network based trust relationships, communication pathways and so on), just weren't there--and one wonders whether that was simply a matter of it still being early days in our Internetted world or something more profound and permanent. It seems likely that some sort of Tsunami Early Warning System will be set up in the region probably with an ICT base (I seem to recall something similar being in place for the Pacific Islands, for hurricanes as well as Tsunami's I would assume), but given the infrequency of these events, how useful it will be seems questionable. So I'm wondering now whether rather than spending a huge amount of money creating a dedicated Tsunami Early Warning System, the governments in the region (or better yet the effected communities) wouldn't be better advised to think about how to use the access that they have available to them in ways that will allow them to have some warning. This would mean that they develop local means for scanning the information universe and then ways of linking the knowledge that results into local social and institutional structures that can translate that knowledge into effective uses such as early warnings. Here I'm not thinking just of what are almost singular events like Tsunamis, but also of more recurrent weather events and even more common social, economic and political events in the larger world that will have a potential impact, sometimes negative, but also potentially positive, on community well-being. >From a Community Informatics perspective, I'm also wondering whether there shouldn't be a significant future role. Certainly, the "Community" side of the equation will be of immense importance as much of the reconstruction will be done of and through existing local communities. But what of the Informatics side. Some skepticism has been expressed concerning the value of ICTs in this context where the need for water, shelter and food are so pressing. Certainly, there is a need for Management/Organizational Informatics at least from the perspective of managing aid and a considerable degree of infrastructure reconstruction. But what of "Community Informatics"...Is this something to be left to a later stage when other matters have been dealt with and as has been suggested, there is some resources and time available for what some regard as "recreational pursuits". Or is it the case, as I have a sense, that CI is something more important than that, and should be built into the communities directly as they are being re-constructed. I'm thinking for example of the need for communities to be able to self-organize and self-manage their reconstruction, to access external resources but to manage their deployment locally themselves. I'm also thinking of the probably increased need to create and maintain links with local diaspora and local well-wishers as they are dispersed around the globe and can act as sources of support, as for example, through remittances. I'm also thinking of the as yet largely unrealized potential for leap-frogging into community-based ICT-enabled health services, linkages for local economic development, supports to re-building local school systems and so on. And perhaps most important, what about the creation of the kind of information and knowledge networks that would bind these communities, many of which appear to be extremely isolated and with few "communication" links into the larger world, as ways of providing early warnings of such future events. Best to all for the New Year and particularly to those impacted by the recent events. Mike Gurstein ------------ ***GKD is solely supported by EDC, a Non-Profit Organization*** To post a message, send it to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. In the 1st line of the message type: subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd Archives of previous GKD messages can be found at: <http://www.edc.org/GLG/gkd/>