Dear Colleagues,

As a former US Peace Corps volunteer and co-founder of a volunteer
clearinghouse in Sri Lanka, I would like to address Tom Abeles' comments
on the role of volunteers. In the aftermath of the tsunami there have
been hundreds of people from around the world that have volunteered
their efforts in the relief and rehabilitation process in this country
alone. To date, we have placed volunteers with about 3 dozen small
community based NGOs, both foreign and Sri Lankan national
organizations.

There is a role for volunteers, just as ask any the over 80 volunteers
we have placed so far. But this must be a structured and demand-driven
activity. We ask for a minimum committment of one month and we base
placements on volunteers' skill sets and the needs of community-level
NGOs both international and local.

It is important to note that the reason this organization was formed was
because no large international NGO, multilateral or bilateral body
operating in Sri Lanka thought that these talents were worth mobilizing.
With the money any one of these NGOs uses to buy and import a new Toyota
Land Cruiser, we could run this operation (with the exception of my
salary, a notable exception to be sure) for over two years and still
have over half the money left over to finance community grant and loan
projects.

The typical response from these organizations when asked about
volunteers is that they are relief and development professionals, and
that we should leave this very complicated task to them. My response is
that asking a community what they want and then mobilizing the resources
to make that happen requires neither an advanced degree nor long years
of experience. All it takes is patience, a listening ear, and access to
informational resources that are readily available on the web.

The real experts in this picture live within the communities themselves.
And anyone, volunteer or professional, would do well to listen to what
they have to say. These people generally have a very clear idea of what
they want and they know how to prioritize these needs. They are prepared
to accept the consequences of their decisions in a way that a consultant
or aid worker is completely incapable of doing - after all they must
live with these consequences long after the funding ends and the
consultants go home.

As I see it, the role of the foreign aid worker is to:

1) Discover what the community needs
2) Translate these needs into something the donor can deliver, 
3) Ensure that the donor receives adequate feedback in the form of
reporting, transparency and accountability.

These activities, if performed in partnership with a community, can be
accomplished by a relative neophyte. My point is that in a world of
limited resources we should be using every possible tool at our
disposal. To say that volunteers aren't needed is to ignore the
phenomenal potential of this nearly limitless resource.

Cheers,

Tod Bruning
--
Tod Bruning
VSL Team Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.VolunteerSriLanka.org
Int'l: +94 776 985663
In Sri Lanka: 0776 985663
  


On Thursday, June 30, 2005, Tom Abeles wrote:

> 3) Volunteers are not a free commodity to any organization. The temporal
> nature and varied level of competencies and knowledge require signifcant
> management to properly utilize the latent talent. Organizations have real
> overheads which need to be acknowledged so that the project can reach
> maximum benefit. At times, it may be worth the cost of highly qualified
> or even over-qualified professionals than to "make do" with under funded
> volunteer organizations.




------------
***GKD is solely supported by EDC, a Non-Profit Organization***
To post a message, send it to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message to:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. In the 1st line of the message type:
subscribe gkd OR type: unsubscribe gkd
Archives of previous GKD messages can be found at:
<http://www.edc.org/GLG/gkd/>

Reply via email to