Damon Chaplin wrote:
>
> Dermot Musgrove wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A couple of thoughts, please excuse me if some of this does not make
> > sense immediately but I program in perl and not C :-)
> >
> > 1) There are two types of <signal> elements with different purposes
> > a) signal to handler definitions
> > b) <accelerator> definition of signal to emit
> > Might not b) be <emit_signal>
>
> Isn't the usage easily determined by the context? i.e. if it's inside a
> <widget> then it is a signal handler, if it's inside an <accelerator> it's
> the name of the signal to emit.
>
> What do others think? I don't mind changing it, but Glade would have to
> support the current tags anyway for backwards compatability.
You are right, I am only asking because XML seems such a rigourous language
and I don't know it well enough to tell if there are problems (in theory).
>
snip
> I should probably have called it 'GnomePixmapEntry:file_entry' but I'm not
> sure its worth changing.
Not on my account, please.
Regards, Dermot
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
