> > I don't think any of them are major problems, warranting a complete > > rewrite. I think we should forget about switching to a new SGML format > > for a while. If in the future it becomes really obvious that we should > > be doing it a certain way, then we can switch. But I don't think it is > > obvious yet. > > Guess I'll be starting my own GUI Builder then :( I have to agree with Damon here. The problems in the XML file are barely a problem. Miguel. +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
- Things wrong with the current xml format Martijn van Beers
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml format Damon Chaplin
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml format Martijn van Beers
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml forma... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml f... Arnaud Charlet
- Re: Things wrong with the current ... Martijn van Beers
- Re: Things wrong with the curr... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: Things wrong with the ... Martijn van Beers
- Re: Things wrong with the ... Rene' Seindal
- Re: Things wrong with the curr... Dermot Musgrove
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml format James Henstridge
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml format Dermot Musgrove
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml format Martijn van Beers
- Re: Things wrong with the current xml format Damon Chaplin