James Henstridge wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Damon Chaplin wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patch. I'll probably include it once I've read through it.
> >
> > I don't think we'll be able to avoid an X connection easily, since Glade uses
> > GTK+ widgets to hold properties, and these will probably need X to function.
>
> Would it make sense to seperate out the C code generator into a separate
> program? If you want a code generator that does not require X, this may
> be a better solution. The existing code generators show that it isn't
> really required to generate the source code.
Yes, it probably would have been a better idea to do that.
But it would be a lot of work to change it.
Damon
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
